Former India captain Sourav Ganguly supported the choice to give Shubman Gill the ODI captaincy, describing it as a “fair call and not the worst decision.”
Ganguly added that Rohit Sharma’s removal as ODI captain was likely a decision taken in consultation with the Champions Trophy and T20 World Cup-winning skipper himself.
Gill led India to a five-match series draw in England in his first series as Test captain. “I think it has been done in consultation with Rohit, from outside… I don’t know what’s inside,” Ganguly said in Kolkata on Thursday.
“Somewhere down the line, I feel that it’s a fair call. Rohit can keep playing and in the meantime, you keep grooming a young captain. So, I really don’t see a problem in that.”
India will begin a five-match T20I series starting October 29 after playing three ODIs in Australia beginning on October 19.
The decision of Ajit Agarkar-led selection committee also looks ahead to the 2027 World Cup in South Africa, when Virat Kohli would be 38 and Rohit will be 40.
“I am sure Rohit must have been spoken to. So, I don’t know whether it is ‘sacking’ or anything. I am sure it is a mutual discussion. Because Rohit has been an outstanding leader. In the last two years, he has won the T20 World Cup. He has won the Champions Trophy. So, performance is not the issue with Rohit Sharma.”
“And I think what’s gone in the selectors’ mind is, as he asked, in two years’ time he will be 40, when the World Cup happens in South Africa. He doesn’t play T20 cricket. So, he will not be a part of the World Cup in 2026 in India. But when they go to 2027 in South Africa, he will be 40 years old. And that’s a big number in sport.”
“And he has played for so long. So, I don’t think anybody is sure whether Rohit will actually play when he is 40. So, I don’t think it’s the worst decision. It happens to everyone. There will not be any exception even in the future — 10 years down the line when Shubman Gill gets close to 40 and scores 12,000-13,000 runs. He will also have to face this situation. Because, as you know, in sport, whether it’s a (Roger) Federer, whether it’s a (Pete) Sampras, whether it’s a (Rafael) Nadal, whether it’s a (Diego) Maradona, they all have to finish someday.”
Ganguly stated that Rohit and Kohli would have to play domestic cricket, but that their future in the national team would ultimately depend on their age and performance.
“Yes, 40 is a lot of age. It depends on him — how fit he stays, how much cricket he plays and how many runs he scores. It is not easy to play just one format. Yes, he would play IPL, but that is only two months a year. As I said, it depends on how fit they (Rohit and Virat) remain and how much performance they keep doing. Whatever opportunity they get, they have to play domestic cricket.”
“Because cricket is a sport where you have to keep playing — otherwise, you lose the touch and the form and the contact. It is everything in life. You have to keep doing it. They have to play domestic cricket. That’s what it is. If they keep doing and performing, they will play for India,” he added.
Across five Tests in England, Gill piled up 754 runs with four centuries — the highest tally by any batter in a Test series between India and England. In doing so, he surpassed Graham Gooch’s 752 from 1990 and eclipsed Sunil Gavaskar’s 732 runs as captain against the West Indies in 1978-79.
Hailing Gill’s rise as captain, Ganguly said: “It’s too early. For the tour of England, I thought he was brilliant. I have seen the five-Test series. The way he has played and the way he has captained the team is extraordinary.
“That is why he has been made the captain of the ODI team for the future. Lot of potential, both as a player and captain,” he concluded.
